Comment by Jenna Summers on December 23, 2011 at 2:53am

I agree with Bill O'Reilly! In my view (and many others) Ron Paul could never beat Pres Obama because of his stance on foreign policy, 9-11 and Iran.

Comment by Debbie Myers on December 23, 2011 at 12:31pm

Bill O'Reilly is for the big government progressives & as seen in this video, flips as often as some of the GOP depending on who he is interviewing.

Ron Paul is the only one that will be able to stand up against Obama. Many Democrats who are fed up with Obama are leaving their party for Ron Paul. All evidence (Bin Laden's letter to US, Commission report, CIA documents, etc.) show that not only was 9-11 "blowback" but it was preceded with warnings that were ignored by the administration. To think that peace is to be a product of endless wars is like saying that we will be embraced for all the innocents we have killed around the world. Our "thinking" has put us in a situation where we will be bankrupt as a nation and at a cost of $2B a week, we cannot continue the destruction. If anyone does not realize how foreign policy & financial devastation for the US are closely linked, I would encourage you to look again.

Comment by Debbie Myers on December 23, 2011 at 1:19pm

If Iran is headed by insane mad men hell bent on destroying Israel why dont they just march their military straight to Israel right now? Because that would be suicide? Well according to the Republicans and Democrats suicide is exactly what Iran will do as soon as they get a nuke... so are they suicidal mad men or not?

If not then they can be dealt with just as the USSR was dealt with.

Iraq had a Christian community dating from the earliest days of Christianity. The Iraqi Christians were attacked and had to flee the country due to the sectarian strife unleashed by the U.S. invasion.

The same sad fate could happen to the Iranian Jews if we're crazy enough to attack Iran.

Iran has a Jewish member of Iranian Parliment for crying out loud....

Comment by Keith Piper on December 23, 2011 at 2:37pm

You have a different opinion and view on things like this. It does not mean you are right. It means you see it differently. Most likely, Iran would never launch a nuke at Israel or the US but they would give suitcase nukes to terrorists to do what they want to and then deny they had anything to do with it.

Comment by Debbie Myers on December 24, 2011 at 1:20am

It's not just me that has the opinion. All attempts seem a bit shady when you look at the facts. Holder is now being linked to the OK bomber McVey, Halibuton has been selling the technology to Iran and if you look at the timelines in wikipedia, it is easy to draw conclusions. It does not mean that I am wrong either. We do feel differently.

We have been interfering in Iran since the 1950's. It hasn't worked and has not made us safer. I encourage everyone to look up nuke power/weapon on wikipedia.

 

Comment